It has been some time since the last one so it seems like the time is ripe for another and this one is a great one for discussion. The fact that that moral laws exist can also be used to argue for god s existence. Some reports exist of supernatural happenings that it would be difficult to explain from a rational, scientific point of view. Anselm began with the concept of god as that than which nothing greater can be. On the impossibility of successful ontological arguments cogprints. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god anselms argument is an a priori argument. In this essay i accordingly examine the ontological argument as a logical proof for gods existence, finding it wanting in this respect. Because of its a priori nature it also offers an actual proof for god s existence which can be logically debated rather than relying on changeable evidence.
I will then discuss why i believe it is a better account for the existence of god than the teleological argument and the cosmological argument. Personally, i believe that the argument can be saved from the objections, and will aim to prove this by presenting and analysing the refutations alongside anselms argument. Alvin plantinga presents an argument for the existence of god using modal logic. Outline the four classic proofs for gods existence. This being than which no greater can be conceived either exists in the mind alone or both in the mind and in reality. Ontological argument philosophy existence justification. We dont need empirical evidence to know that its true. Based upon this general rule, we can divide the existing arguments for the existence of god into three basic categories, starting from the kind of arguments that need the most premises and axioms. However, a famous and powerful argument for gods existence known as the ontological argument purports to be able to show that gods being the greatest possible being entails gods existence. Outline the four classic proofs for god s existence. The ontological argument alvin plantinga 1 the third theistic argument i wish to discuss is the famous ontological argument first formulated by anselm of canterbury in the eleventh century. The ontological argument st anselm and descartes both famously presented an ontological argument for the existence of god. Explain the cosmological argument for the existence of god.
A defense of the ontological argument daniel andrews in this essay i will first explain the ontological argument and my reasons for choosing it. The transcendental argument for the non existence of god contests the existence of an intelligent creator god by demonstrating that such a being would make logic and morality contingent, which is incompatible with the presuppositionalist assertion that they are necessary, and contradicts the efficacy of science. The ontological argument for the existence of god appearedto. Descartes ontological argument stanford encyclopedia of. These arguments seem to me to have a common pattern.
Kant on the cosmological argument university of michigan. The teleological argument moves to the conclusion that there must exist a designer. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. Arguments that prove the existence of god uk essays. Argument from possibility and necessity reductio argument we find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, that come into being and go out of being i. The second ontological argument examined i god s existence is either necessary or impossible i various other people have tried to prove god s existence possible i leibniz and godel have tried to argue that the only way something can be impossible is if it invovles negation or limitation. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses. Descartes ontological argument for the existence of god 2 words 6 pages. Pdf in this article i offer a new interpretation of saint anselms ontological. There are many arguments that can he presented to prove the existence of god. In defending the faith, however, it is useful to present a way of proving the existence of god that begins from the fact of the existence of the world.
The arguments attempt to prove god s existence from the meaning of the word god. In the same context, descartes also characterizes the ontological argument as a proof from the essence or nature of god, arguing that necessary existence cannot be separated from the essence of a supremely perfect being without contradiction. Therefore, if that, than which nothing greater can be conceived, exists in the understanding alone, the very being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, is one, than which a greater can be conceived. About the work although anselms argument for gods existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, anselm presents the argument as clari. In defending the faith, however, it is useful to present a way of proving the existence of god that begins from the fact of the existence.
The parody objection to the ontological argument for the existence of god advances parallel arguments apparently proving the existence of various absurd entities. The ontological argument and the existence of god the ontological argument has. The cosmological argument for the existence of god by w. Alvin plantingas modal ontological s argument is a irrefutable logical argument for the existence of god. The inference from design to designer is why the teleological argument is also known as the design argument. What do you think of when someone says the word god. This method employs intuition or, what is the same for descartes, clear and distinct perception. Godels ontological argument, in its different variants, is amongst the most discussed. They have agreed with hume and kant that existence is not merely a matter of logic, and that god s existence cannot be demonstrated on the basis of thought alone. An anthropological argument for god s existence is then any argument which begins with man and ends with god as an explanation. Each of the phenomena cited in my opening paragraph has formed the starting point of an argument for the existence of god. God is, by definition, the most perfect being imaginable. The godproperties include necessary existence, necessary. Ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that god exists, from.
But they have found in the world and our experience of it reasons to believe that god exists. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is selfcontradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. We conceive of god as a being than which no greater can be conceived. Here we present five arguments in favor of the existence of god. Thomas aquinas and immanuel kant all believe in the existence of god, but their theory on his existence differs. In this paper i present a novel objection to ontological arguments. In the ontological argument we start from a concept in the mind. Jun 28, 2009 dean zimmerman and alvin plantinga discuss the ontological argument for the existence of god. Maydole ontological arguments are deductive arguments for the existence of god from general metaphysical principles and other assumptions about the nature or essence of god. The word ontological comes from ontology, the study of ology of what exists or being ont. Anselm begins his argument by introducing the fool, a reference to psalms 53. Anselm developed a controversial a priori argument for the exis tence of god. Explain the cosmological argument for the existence of god essay. Ontology is concerned with the reality behind our perceptions.
Mackie objects to descartes ontological argument by. What are the strengths of the ontological argument for god. Fascination with the argument stems from the effort to prove gods existence from simple but powerful premises. Strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument. This helps to explain why ontological arguments have fascinated philosophers for. For some, logical arguments for god s existence may need to be supplemented by those from practical experience. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses ontology. The structure of the ontological argument can be outlined as follows the argument is based on anselms proslogion 2. This makes it hard to use the cosmological argument to prove the existence of god as the criticisms also make sense. My goal here is to focus on spinozas ontological argument.
Descartes ontological or a priori argument is both one of the most fascinating and poorly understood aspects of his philosophy. The teleological and cosmological arguments shall be first discussed, criticised by showing their reliance on the ontological argument, which shall then be shown to be an inadequate argument. The ontological argument is an argument based not on observation of the world like the cosmological and teleological arguments but rather on reason alone. What is the ontological argument for the existence of god. There will not be time to discuss other arguments, or to discuss arguments against the existence of god. They have agreed with hume and kant that existence is not merely a matter of logic, and that gods existence cannot be demonstrated on the basis of thought alone. This argument for the existence of god has fascinated philosophers ever since anselm first stated it. After kants, and others, critiques of anselm, most philosophers regarded the ontological argument as. The general idea of the ontological argument is based on the notion that the concept of god as the greatest being implies that god existsif not, there could be something greater, namely an existent greatest beingbut this being would be god. Discuss anselms ontological argument for gods existence.
The argument succeeds as it is deductive and clear conclusions can be drawn from it, this leaves the argument with only one answer. Sadra discussed avicennas arguments for the existence of god, claiming that they were not a priori. The four classical proofs of god s existence attempt to argue from both experience the cosmological, teleological and moral arguments and reason alone the ontological argument, with all of them, but especially the latter being open to critical analysis. The anthropological argument is actually a family of arguments, all of which have human beings as their starting point. In this video they will be debating the ontological argument. We follow a leibnizian ontotheology, especially two of leibnizs. Gods existence is inferred directly from the fact that necessary. In this essay it shall be discussed whether there are any arguments which work to prove the existence of god. Descartes p107, sec 67 the case of proving god s existence is special. That which can be conceived not to exist is not god. Third, the cosmological argument presupposes the ontological argument, but not merely because it tacitly assumes the soundness of the ontological argument as a premise a608b 637. The second ontological argument examined i gods existence is either necessary or impossible i various other people have tried to prove gods existence possible i leibniz and godel have tried to argue that the only way something can be impossible is if it invovles negation or limitation.
The proof contained in proslogion ii is widely known, it was repeatedly debated by medieval scholastics and finally ruined by kant. The ontological argument is, roughly, the argument that god, being that than which no greater can be conceived, must exist, for if he did not then it would be possible to conceive of an existent god, which would be greater than that than which no greater can be conceived, which is absurd. One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an allperfect god is the ontological argument. The ontological argument was introduced by anselm of canterbury in his book proslogion. An argument for the existence of god articulate your idea. Ontological argument, argument that proceeds from the idea of god to the reality of god. Anselms argument is a priori, it is independent of experience. Anselms ontological argument anselm, 1078 can be regarded as the ancestor of modern ontological arguments such as godels. Ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that god exists. Anselm and the proof for the existence of god 1129 words.
The ontological argument for the existence of god is a classical christian argument that contends that the very concept of god logically and necessarily demands existence. While the second chapter proves the mere existence of god, the third chapter proves the necessity of gods existence. The ontological argument argument for the existence of god. For many positive ontological arguments, there are parodies which purport to establish the non existence of god s. Anselms point of view is one basis for the ontological argument. This being than which no greater can be conceived either exists in. Specifically, the ontological argument reasons from the study of being ontology. The ontological argument and the devil nagasawa 2010. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. Arguments of this type are referred to as cosmological arguments. Anselm, offered an early and influential reply to the ontological argument. Objections to the ontological argument existence of god. The inseparablness of valleys from moun tains does not show that mountains exist, but the inseparablness of existence from god does. In simple terms, what is the ontological argument for the existence of god.
Religious topics abound on listverse and they are frequently the most commented upon. Dec 18, 2009 the parody objection to the ontological argument for the existence of god advances parallel arguments apparently proving the existence of various absurd entities. The word teleology comes from telos, which means purpose or goal. In these arguments they claim to demonstrate that all human experience and action even the condition of unbelief, itself is a proof for the existence of god, because god s existence is the necessary condition of their intelligibility. Identify which two of the following statements are analytic and explain why. I also think that the ontological argument, although great, its a little too complicated to even warrant it in a debate even if we acknowledge its use in history. Descartes repeats the ontological argument in a few other central texts. For a useful discussion of the history of ontological arguments in the modern.
So a being than which no greater can be conceived i. The existence of god what we call religious experience can differ greatly. Their versions of the argument are slightly different, but. The idea is that it takes a purposer to have purpose, and so, where we see things obviously intended for a purpose, we can assume that those things were made for a reason. God, in other words, is the greatest conceivable being if. Apr 11, 2012 the ontological argument for the existence of god refers to the claim that the very logical possibility of gods existence entails his actuality. The ontological argument for god s existence is a particular kind of philosophical argument which christian theologians have developed for centuries as a way of showing why it is rational to believe in god s existence. The ontological argument baggaley 6 inseparable from god, and hence that he really exists. The ontological argument is an argument for god s existence based entirely on reason. According to this argument, there is no need to go out looking for physical evidence of god s existence. The ontological argument begins with the claim that god, by definition, is infinitely great. Descartess ontological argument descartes also has his own version of the ontological argument, where like anselm, he focuses on a characterization of god, and then moves to show how this characterization entails gods existence. What is interesting here is that the corresponding notion of faith is.
How does the ontological argument support the existence of. In a sense the discussion about the ontological argument is outside of religious language. What is the teleological argument for the existence of god. Anselm believes in god but wants to give a rational explanation of god s existence. The ontological argument for the existence of god the ontological argument is an a priori argument. Before i begin my argument i will reconstruct the a priori ontological argument put forward by anselm to prove the existence of the greatest conceivable. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. We propose a modification of godels ontological argument for gods existence from his ontologischer beweis manuscript 1970. Is the very concept of god enough to prove his existence. Pdf the ontological argument and the existence of god david. The argument from the paucity of benign mutations d. Jun 30, 2014 this is all fine and good, say nontheists, but this is a description of a being whose existence we dont affirm. Thus god exists in the understanding, even if not in reality.
The teleological argument is an attempt to prove the existence of god that begins with the observation of the purposiveness of nature. The existence of god richard swinburne university of oxford. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of god. Original german text available online, 628 kb pdf file, maintained by. How does the ontological argument support the existence of god. A formalized version of the reductio is located in the appendix b. Oct 29, 2017 join george and john as they discuss different philosophical theories. A proof the key premises of which can be known independent of any experience of the actual world. Ontological argument i the ontological argument comes in various forms, but the common element is that it asserts that gods existence can be proven simply from the concept of god. It is the argument that, if one understands what is meant by the word god and follows it out to the logical conclusion, it is impossible for such a being not to exist. Yet many people seem to have a hard time understanding it. Essay on the ontological argument for the existence of god.
Pdf ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that god exists. I discuss recent versions of the parody objection concerning the existence of antigod and the devil, as introduced by peter millican and timothy chambers. The ontological arguments of god are many, the weaknesses they suffer can be found in this reference. The form of the argument is that of a reductio ad absurdum argument. In contrast, the ontological arguments are conceptual in roughly the following sense. Discussion of gaunilo usually focuses on his attempt to parody anselms. Original german text available online, 628 kb pdf file, maintained by alain. As it is by far the most complex and misunderstood arguments for god out of the god argument. The ontological argument for the existence of god cross. The ontological argument for the existence of god word. In this paper we wish to discuss the ontological argument for the existence of god. While the second chapter proves the mere existence of god, the third chapter proves the necessity of god s existence. This fool has said that in his heart, that there is no god, or denying the existence of god.
1205 1384 595 439 38 811 204 584 110 667 170 1134 188 564 168 792 260 57 749 428 249 847 1495 44 630 176 1177 1108 1457 124 940 1199 490